tuesday's reprise......10th grade

why 10th grade is awesome, and other assorted or unassorted thoughts

Saturday, June 09, 2007

Venture Capital Hacks

Hi all,

Since i have been looking into starting a venture/investing community for small companies, i figured that i had best read up on everything i can.


Hunt around this site for a bit, it's got some inetesting stuff.

btw, could you post "father tom's" blog in a comment please.....

An entrepreneur's guide to hacking venture capital

jah ne

Thursday, May 24, 2007

cool watches

Tokyo flash has THE BEST WATCHES ON EARTH....


well, except for burberry maybe.

check it out:

http://www.tokyoflash.com/en/watches/1/

some are downright ugly, and some are cool....

but none reach the downright classy feel of a burberry watch
http://www.brown712.com/bbwatch.jpg


http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/B000GGVHTQ/sr=1-6/qid=1180030335/ref=dp_image_0/105-9502600-5354021?ie=UTF8&n=3367581&s=jewelry&qid=1180030335&sr=1-6

Thursday, May 17, 2007

my idea

......one website, under God [or more practically: under Google], with Funding and capital for all!

I think this could work if a few thinks can be sorted out...

1. this isn't another market, it's a private [members-only] investing firm open to small buisiness owners with reaslitic buisiness plans, big dreams, and innovative ideas.

2. any buisiness accepting funding will be selling 40% or so stock in the company. Enough for the owners to stay in control, but enough for the members to have leverage, and a voice.

3. members are not liable for any debts, nor is the site. all investments have a risk of loss, but not of more than you are comfortable putting in.

4. in case of a company sale, i'll give an example.
Company A.
Started last year, and accepted $10,000 in funding (40%) of initial worth.
Company A recieves a takeover bid last month and since the members own a large part of the company, they get to participlate in the voting over whether they think they would rather retain their shares, or get big dividends from the sale. If Company A sells for 1 million smackaroos, then $400,000 dollars belongs to the shareholders, to be ditributed according to how many $50 shares you purchases.

5. The $50 share price is subject to change on a case by case basis. Or maybe i am just settling for the status quo. Okay. Say we don't have shares at all. Say Company B (i love all these generic enterprises, lol) makes 100 million in the first quarter, and so 40 million belongs to shareholders. Since you invested $200 and there is no set stake price, then the profit is divided up according to percentages. So if stockholders initially invested 10 million into company B and reap 40 million, then everybody will get 400% gains on their stakes, no matter how much they invested. invest one cent, get four...i guess a minimum of $10 would me practical..

6. dividends will be paid quarterly, after a certain incubator period, but only after profits are substantial enough to continue growth. in other words, say Company C makes $10,000. If it needs all that money to buy a new ice cream machine to continue growing as a firm, then it doesn't make much sense to pay the investors now. Also, members may make offers for a stake of some value to another members through private messages

7. all companies must stay in touch with investors by updating their "track records page" [ a blog, some charts, and a complete overview of the company, people involved, and buisiness model. If you don't like how things are going, then you can pull out at any time, to minimize losses.

8. these things are just what comes to mind, and at this point, it's looking more and more like some new finacial institution. Obviously, i'd like it to be simpler. Bascially, i'd trying to provide your average 'venture capitalist' joe with some security and peace of mind that:

A: he has a decent chance of success. a company with a good buisiness model, which can find it's niche ( not in a crowded market like search or something ) and the customers to support it, and has competent management has a decent chance of succeeding.

B: he isn't going to lose the shirt off his back or be liable for a company's mismanagement as an investor.

C: peace of mind that these are real companies (not scams) that he can keep in touch with, stay somewhat connected (i like to call it "company personality": feeling like it's a cool family) with, and put real investment in. Not a novelty. Serious investment.

Real Venture capitalist firms try to predict what people will go for, by doing market tests and so on, and seem to have a decent track record. Some bright lights, some failures, but the lights shine brighter than the failures. The members are your market test. Plus you know that

While providing the average 'entreprenuer' joe with:

A: Some dough. The whole point.

B: an initial fan base. supporters. people who want the company to succeed.

C: a way to test his buisiness model and get a sense of what people really think of his product of buisiness. like learning to swim in a pool before swimming in the ocean with all the waves.

D: press and exposure. getting your name out as something new and innovative is the first step. if it intrigues me, i may investigate even if you don't get enough votes to approve funding.

Which reminds me.
Members will weed out the buisinesses based on buisiness plans, markets (not search, digg clone, etc., online games...enough of those) uniqueness, etc. by voting, first.

Then the buisiness will ask for a certain amount for 40% stake. this will vary.

Investors pledge an amount they are willing to invest. If the buisiness gets to the total they want, the funding is closed.
If they don't, they can re-structure thier proposal for a smaller, more reasonable amount.


well i got to go now.

this is sort of incomplete, but whatever. I need to think about it more anyway.


Saturday, March 31, 2007

Hey, I have been looking at a few aerospace news blobs and found out about ornithopters, otherwise known as bird-like flying machines. Also, i found a bit about a resurected technology first patented in the 1930s that could change alot about aerospace in the near future

First, the UFO. Using the Coanda effect first patented 1936, the whole upside down bowl produces lift as air is blon down upon it. I was surprised to learn that the US government has 2 teams of personell who have been working on this technology.

http://jlnlabs.imars.com/gfsuav/gfsuav.htm



Also, the ornithopters were pretty cool

this one built in canada is the first large one.

http://www.ornithopter.ca/images/2006/flapper_flight_08july_video2.mpeg

the technology works for birds because they are so light. That canadian one is using the help of a jet engine to get off the ground initially.

Remembering Zidane

a tribute to a legend.....this vid overdoes it a bit, but he was really that good. A Tech post tonight maybe.

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Middlesbrough 5-1 Bolton

more sweetness

West Ham 1-2 Liverpool

since i haven't posted anything in a while, here is a good example of a great team taking apart the defense of another

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

A Closer Look At The iPhone

the iphone is too expensive, and not revolutionary enough to sell well, but it's still awesome...also, i got the other ruby on rails book. I can burn W a copy. It's not pirated either, this is the 2nd edition beta (under development version) which was distributed for free.

jah ne,
Brian

Saturday, December 23, 2006

Great AJAX diagram

Here is a cool diagram i found on digg (only 2 diggs! that explains alot in a small space about how Ajax works. It's another layer of software that helps things move faster, and lets users do more on their side, faster....